Look, and Me..

Very interesting article today by Barry Critchley @ The National Post . It was on LOOK COMMUNICATIONS , and shareholder disapproval on management compensation.

The LOOK COMMUNCATIONS saga would make any spy novel boring - its really an incredible story of good, bad and ugly . I first worked with Look when they emerged in the 1990's , mid 1990's, and were owned by several Canadian Corporate heavyweights . They floundered a bit on technology, dot com impaled, and their corporate stakeholders abandoned them . They did a CCAA filing, re emerged and went public via some sort of RTO . Along the way there was a major cast of charachters, some very interesting people . I had a great relationship with their CFO / COO , who ultimately left and did a great job in stabilizing the company . In 2005 I founded my own financing firm, and Look was my first customer !!

Along the way I became a paying customer also . They did a customer mailer awhile back and said they were closing shop - Myself and many thousand others scrambled to get new satellite and internet at home .

The whole financial scenario seems very unbelievable - they close shop, have millions in the bank and assets for sale , etc .

Where it all ends I don't really know, but what a very uncomfortable story .

Stan

Grants , & me

Interesting article today in the Financial Post by Brad Cherniak - Sapient Capital - Toronto

The article talks about business clusters - geographic focal points for business - he uses the example of Silicon Valley .

I worked in Kanata when for ten years in the 80's and it clearly was the first ' Cluster' area in Canada from my perpspective - Kitch/Waterloo seems a current incumbent .

The gist of the article is of government support and resources for these clusters .

I strongly disagree when Cherniak says the good new is that grant monies and resources are flowing to small business - working in the SME landscape everyday I certainly don't see that .

He is dead on though when referring to government intervention in the credit crunch as being somewhat undesirable - we should allow ' capital to flow freely where it wants ..' .

Anyway, I will let you know when Small and Medium business are getting all the capital they want - for health reasons don't hold your breath.
Stan

So What Else is New and Me - Nothing

A great short article today on BNET.COM - I have attached it below, bottom line summary is that the TARP funds in the states didn't stimulate Small Business Lending. I would point out that when the U.S. press talks about a Small Business that in Canada that's probably a pretty impressive business .

Did the same thing happen in Canada . I sure think so . The Federal Govt Secured Credit facility , viewed as a saviour of small business lending seems to have not completed one deal, the recession is over, and most lenders , if not all, are as cautious as ever . The mega bucks seems to have gone into ' infrastructure ', although I still count 20 potholes on the way to work . At the end of the day it will probably be small and medium business that takes us back to where we need to be.
Stan

->

TARP Fails to Spur Small Business Lending

By Alain Sherter | Feb 1, 2010

• Share
  • MyBNET
  • Email
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google
  • Delicious
  • StumbleUpon
  • Newsvine
  • LinkedIn
  • My Yahoo
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
• Print
• Recommend0

The good news coming out of the federal government’s latest assessment of TARP is that the financial system is alive, big banks are raising money and the final tab for the program might be less than initially estimated.

Not small potatoes. But the financial industry bailout is failing in two key respects: reigniting bank lending to U.S. consumers and businesses, and helping homeowners avoid foreclosure, concludes special inspector general Neil Barofsky in his office’s quarterly report to Congress. More broadly, he expressed concern that financial reform efforts are falling short:

Stated another way, even if TARP saved our financial system from driving off a cliff back in 2008, absent meaningful reform, we are still driving on the same winding mountain road, but this time in a faster car.

TARP’s failure to stimulate bank lending to small businesses is particularly regrettable. In March 2009, the Treasury Department announced the “Unlocking Credit for Small Businesses” program and later earmarked up to $30 billion for small-business lending. As of Dec. 31, however, no funds had been disbursed under the program. Barofsky doesn’t explain why.

Yes, demand for credit by smaller companies is down. It’s also fair to ask whether community banks really need taxpayer money to boost lending for commercial customers. And there’s a risk in pumping funds into some businesses that, barring a sharp economic recovery, might go bust.

But now isn’t the time to reel in aid for such enterprises (and their lenders). Small Business Administration lending is finally showing an uptick, an encouraging sign. And as everyone knows, the key to reviving the economy is to create jobs. That means taking a chance on small businesses and small banks, just as the feds have taken a chance on big companies and big banks.

THE BIG 6 BANKS, AND ME

I got a report send to myself by a contact at RBC outlining an analyst report on the Big 6 banks in Canada . Interesting title, it was called ' CAPITAL PUNISHMENT ' and revolved around how the banks are wrestling with regulators in U.S. and Canada on their capital base requirements and their investments in their brokerages and personal wealth businesses . For what it's worthy RBC seemed to be positioned best, but all had positive comments .

Every day the main business story seems to be the banks , both U.S. and in Canada, where OBAMA seems to be somewhat courageously taking them on and to task ! Business and banks view all this as intrusion -

I hope the dust settles and banks can get back to anything approaching lending normalcy in Canada re small and medium sized business .

Stan

The Fed's, BDC, And Me

Ooops, they did it again, The National Post reported today that the Federal CSCF - The Canadian Secured Credit Facility did another deal, as I understand it would be deal # 2 . The first was with a Dutch owned construction equipment firm .

The deal had BDC , as administrator, buying 1.2 Billion dollars ( yes thats billion ) in floor plan receivables . From who - GMAC and FORD !

Great deal for all parties concerned I guess, kudos of course . Can I be forgiven for again thinking this facility was supposed to fund Canadian businesses in the current liquidity crunch . The more things change the more they stay the same . Don't get me started.

Stan

BIG BANKS, and Me

Last several days one of the biggest business stories in the U.S. has been OBAMA's efforts to control and regulate banks - somewhat of a punishment for their part in the sub prime and liquidity debacle we just went through .

The recurring theme has been ' too big to fail ' - I have pasted part of a recent article in BNET.COM that provides some backdrop .

As Canadians we know our banking system :

1. Is Different
2. Had little or no role in the worldwide debacle

It is very difficult for us as Canadians as imagining a bank failure in our BIG 6 banks .

I guess that's one of the benefits of conservatism , although all my business customers feel they are paying a bit of a price for conservatism .

Stan

--

President Obama left out a critical element yesterday in announcing his plan to limit the size of banks — how you do it. A number of ideas are kicking around, but following are the most likely methods.

Asset Cap. This would parallel the national deposit cap, which prohibits banks from controlling more than 10 percent of domestic insured deposits. But under this approach the cap would limit a financial company’s total assets, which include loans, reserves, investment securities and real estate, to a set percentage of the banking industry’s total assets.

The U.S. banking sector has roughly $13 trillion in assets. That means a 10 percent cap would limit banks to no more than $1.3 trillion in size. That would affect Bank of America (BAC), Citigroup (C) and JPMorgan Chase (JPM). A five percent cap would also reel in Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS) and Wells Fargo (WFC).

Liability Cap. A bank’s liabilities mostly comprises its checking, savings, CD and other core deposits. Under this method, a financial firm’s maximum total liabilities would be set as a percentage of U.S. GDP, which is roughly $14 trillion. So if the cap were fixed at 10 percent, a banking company’s liabilities couldn’t exceed $1.4 trillion. That would affect Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan.

BRIGHTENING , AND ME

Today's Globe and Mail had an article that I think quite accurately reflects some of the current business environment ; it was titled ' LOAN AVAILABILITY BRIGHTEN - FOR BIG FIRMS ' and highlighted the fact the the liquidity crunch seems to be easing for larger firms, but small firms are still very challenged in getting credit, and additional collateral is being requested by the banks, etc. . The article indicated that many businesses are ' high risk ' borrowers ; I am of the opinion if they are higher risk they should not get the loans, credit, operating lines etc - But businesses with solid track records and good potential , albeit smaller in size, still seemed to be lumped in with the bad . That doesn't seem fair.
Stan